Horn, Alford, F-2000-335, (June 29, 2001)
(Discovery violation, sentence modified)

Martin, Todd, F-1999-723, (May 15, 2000)
(Discovery violation, sanction barring defense witnesses too harsh)

Meadows, James Dean v. State, COCA Case No. F-2003-189 (September 30, 2004)
(Discovery) Trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress videotaped statements made as a result of an illegal arrest and taken in violation of Miranda rights.

Meadows, Joe Dean v. State, COCA Case No. F-2003-196 (September 30, 2004)
(Sixth Amendment; Discovery) Sixth Amendment violated when trial court allowed admission of codefendant’s confession implicating Appellant. Trial court erred in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress videotaped statements made as a result of an illegal arrest and taken in violation of Miranda rights.

State v. Daren Levi Geyer, COCA Case No. S-2011-543 (April 6, 2012)
(State Appeals) State appeals orders suppressing evidence due to discovery violations. COCA finds no abuse of discretion. "Common sense dictates that the more severe the sanction, the more likely the problem will be remedied in future cases."

State v. Blair Rix Miller, COCA Case No. S-2011-545 (April 6, 2012)
(State Appeals) State appeals orders suppressing evidence due to discovery violations. COCA finds no abuse of discretion. "Common sense dictates that the more severe the sanction, the more likely the problem will be remedied in future cases."

State v. Nicholas Demir Say, COCA Case No. S-2011-544 (April 6, 2012)
(State Appeals) State appeals orders suppressing evidence due to discovery violations. COCA finds no abuse of discretion. "Common sense dictates that the more severe the sanction, the more likely the problem will be remedied in future cases."